This style of game is so often side-on 2D static, this visually added dynamism that freshened it up for me notably. Solid mechanics, rewarding gameplay, interesting choices to make. In a crowded genre I was glad to play this game - but for me, while there were opportunities to, I was not going to climb much further than the amount of time I've logged so far.

3/10 didn't really find it interesting. Graphics are cool though.

I am actually shocked at all the negative reviews, comparing this game to Slay the Spire and then complaining about the difficulty curve. How can you play Slay the Spire and write a review saying this game is hard and unbalanced? Slay the Spire is one of the sweatiest roguelike deckbuilders out there, one mistake and you are toast... This game is much more forgiving and even without a proper tutorial or introduction to the game mechanics, if you play good enough you can beat the game or at least get pretty deep into it, while not popping your forehead veins. The game is fun, has an awesome presentation (much better than most games from this genre), the actual real complain I can agree with is the lack of tutorial or proper explanation of game mechanics, but then again, you've played games from the same genre before, you should be able to successfully pick up the game's mechanics as you go along, which is a testament that the game's difficulty curve is different from what people are writing down here.

To all the people review bombing this game: have you tried getting better at the game? Have you tried learning the game's mechanics? Have you tried playing more than one or two runs? The whole point of the genre is that you are going to lose when you first start so that you come back better and more capable of dealing with the game's difficulty! The whole point of the genre is difficulty and people complain about the difficulty? Get good, get better or just reconsider your options before getting into the genre.