Giant Robots vs screaming insurgents.

Everything in the game is excellent, and it's the only geopolitical game that truly has almost everything. From a very good and detailed economy to the map objects themselves—military, economic, and civilian—it's truly impressive. The same goes for military units, with detailed descriptions, including supply units.

The only downside is diplomacy and inter-state relations. That’s the only thing missing. It needs improvement so that relationships become more complex. For example, ideologies that can’t have good relations, countries known for tense and hostile relationships, old rivalries that still last today.

It should be changed so that not everyone ends up in ideal relations after a few years. If this gets fixed and small features are added to diplomacy—such as pressure tactics, peace deal pressures, etc.—and the sanctions system is improved (since it’s a bit buggy at the moment), it would be great. Also, once a country imposes sanctions, they never lift them.

All in all, only diplomacy needs to be improved.

Game has poory transparency and accessability to information interface. Also control and managment of units are unplayable. Furthermore, they should extend economy to more categories like on stock market:

Canned food, Cerials, Vegetables, Fruits, Livestock, Meat, Dairy, Energy, Oil, Gas, Minerals, Rare-earth minerals, Industrial metals, Precious metals, Timber and Ruber.

Maintaince of buildings complex are to high... In reality salaries of people who doing it are unsagnificant especially in poor GDP/p countries and buildings once are built lasts for decades... Not all countries building infrastructure from paper like in USA (New York is exeption), where little stronger wind blows all away... Central Europe including Russia build everything from concrete, bricks or stone... So what the????

Than, AI ministers are stupid and useless. For examle they buy products until you got buget into debt. All in all if you are leader you need to have ability to coordinate things not directly engage it.

Not to mention you should have chargo ships or pipeline to bring oil and gas to your country... Now you can buy from USA what ever quantities you like which is unreal. For transporting gas by ship you need to build LNG terminals. Good game pay attention to such details.

When buying or selling discounts are unreal high... its good for profit, but kills spirit of the game... Good relationship with other countries should be earned and influence prices or willingnes to interact with your country more strict and harder. In real life big countries wont even consieder meeting with small country. So you must act trough friendly middlesized country like Germany to get what you need. Maybe also elected as reperesentative of many united countries like EU and so on.

Next are countries in war... it is not visible which country is in it. And sound of gunfight all the time ripping players mind when playing for hours. In short its very hard to conclude who is fighting where... It should be better if units are displaced over the map more as icons than as real-time tactical game. This logic totally sucks. Google out deepState map of war in Ukraine to see how things should look like.

Of course there are bugs like ships wont enter into harbor.

SO... Final verdict. Its little bit better than Geopolitic simulator, but stil not even close to its idea of gaming interface. Both games are unplayble and need extensive workout.