7
Products
reviewed
351
Products
in account

Recent reviews by Shroompat

Showing 1-7 of 7 entries
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
42.1 hrs on record (40.4 hrs at review time)
If you like a good story game with tactical rpg elements this is for you. it gets a little grindy and tedious at times, but the gripping moments are action packed and the funny moments will make you chuckle. well worth the 25 bucks i paid for it.
gave me around 50-60 hours of gameplay, while rushing through it.
Posted 27 November, 2022.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
12.1 hrs on record (12.0 hrs at review time)
Missing a few things that an AOE game needs, but enjoyable and on it's way to being a great game if it gets a few more update runs.
Posted 27 November, 2021.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
6.8 hrs on record (6.5 hrs at review time)
An unfinished game, soul less, and a far cry from what a battlefield should be. Devs should be embarassed to even release such hot steaming garbage. *pun intended.

Server problems, gameplay bugs, missing content, lack of progression. you name it, Battlefield 2042 is missing it.

i've played every game since the beginning of this franchise, I waited years for you to get it right, but no longer, this series is dead to me and i will be spending my money on games where the devs actually care about their product.
Posted 20 November, 2021.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
26.8 hrs on record
Early Access Review
I played a week long game of Rimworld, and when i finally lifted off the planet and ended the game.
i booted up Space Haven and continued from there but in space.

10/10 would play more when there's more content.
Posted 20 February, 2021.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
9 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
9.1 hrs on record (8.4 hrs at review time)
Great game, but plagued with the bugs which still havent been fixed since release 2 years ago.

Invisible zombies, contant disconnection problems and many more.

Awesome expansion but none of the bugs were fixed!!!
Posted 17 March, 2020.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
5 people found this review helpful
103.6 hrs on record (95.9 hrs at review time)
After several multiplayer disconnects with a hard monster resulting in sessions of 45mins of play before dying and nothing to gain for it. it becomes frustrating increasingly fast. Fix your connection issues.

Update: Came back for iceborne to find out my 100hrs of gameplay has been deleted. Will not be playing again, thanks capcom.
Posted 21 August, 2018. Last edited 10 January, 2020.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
105 people found this review helpful
2.9 hrs on record (1.5 hrs at review time)
I loved the Stronghold crusader 1 as a kid, so as soon as i saw Crusader 2? i hit the instabuy button.
Boy was that a bad idea after playing the game.
(i havent touched the multiplayer so i wont comment on that part)

I'll list some of my pros and cons about the game so far:

Cons:
------------- In General -----------------------------
-Menu, really simple (looks too "clean/old fashioned") [maybe just me? but thats what i thought]
-Artwork, Seems a little simple and cartoony for this sort of game.
-Options, Severe lack of options customisation! No controls changing! No advanced graphic settings (for a 2014 game).

-------------Moving to gameplay now---------------

-Unit Pathfinding sucks. utter terrible. (could be improved with a patch so wouldnt worry too much)
-Wall building system is terrible, i could place a wall then try to delete and not work.the wall is still there! (probably a bug)
-No moats! What happened to Crusader 1's moats??
-Everything is over simplified by a lot compared tot he original.
-No tooltips or explanations ( have to look on game wiki but i think the devs are being lazy here)
-Graphics in general,Textures are horrible! for a 2014 game
-LESS buildings than the original, YES, LESS STUFF, (isnt the point of a sequel is to expand the original?? not take stuff out!)
-Maps arent well designed, not many trees, not enough grass etc.
-Expensive! Everything is so expensive and selling doesnt get you much, (maybe needs a balance)
-They got rid of the happiness, decorations system! (sandbox without decorations?! thats suicidal)
-Units dont look as good as they should for a 2014 game, (maybe i should include this in graphics?)
-Right/left clicking was weird, cant change controls for these.
-Building against a natural ditch or water doesnt work very well, wall might cut off randomly without the battlements.
-Natural disasters!! Who the heck thought it was a good idea to include this??! (well at least you could turn it off xD)
-Did they recycle voices from the original? (i dont really mind but might not sit well with some people)

Pros: ( lets end witht he happy stuff)
-AI changes were much better than the original, although they still fall for the same tricks used in the original.
-Likes the market auto sell system!, nice touch!
-Got the same old Crusader 1 feel to the game!
-Liked some of the new defensive attachments.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Somethings devs might want to consider:
-INFORMATION! Add more tips!
-When your resources are low make it blink or something!
-Can still repair walls instantly while enemy blowing up walls with trebs.
-Add moats back in.
-Maybe try some better graphics? ( dont know if its possible at this point).

Also just a note to the devs!

We love your work, we dont mind how long it takes to come out, be it 10 years or 20 years but please make it a great game worthy of the firefly title. I know you guys can do it from seeing crusader 1. Keep up the good work!

Shroompat out.





Posted 23 September, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Showing 1-7 of 7 entries