You're on the good side there, for trying to point out that which they can and should fix, I agree there.

i realize that in many of my written reviews, i ONLY point out the bad stuff (it's not the same in my video reviews), so you might think that i'm being overly critical, but i point out all of those 'bad stuff' so that the developers can know what issues they have to fix in their games. if you just praise a game for 'good graphics' or whatever then what is the developer going to improve from that? some of my written reviews highlight over a dozen or more negatives, but it's not that i hate the game necessarily, in fact you'll find some games that i've recommended yet i pointed out 10+ negatives on it. my only hope is that the devs read the 'bad points' and then learns from it to improve their game, such as this dev for instance https://test-steamproxy.haloskins.io/id/lfpg/recommended/2622280

I had meant Early Access, but I had seen quite a few on Early access that were heavily criticized.

by EA games, do you mean 'early access' or 'electronic arts'? because i absolutely don't have a crusade against early access games. there are some early access games that I have many hundreds of hours in and I regularly review & recommend games in early access

Some of your reviews are generally really well thought out, but this crusade against EA games confuses me, did you play GRAV or Cubeworld and base all of your opinions off a handful of money grubbing devs, I mean look at Schedule 1, Starbound, Terraria, etc. They are all games that were originall in EA, and they did fantastic. Also your issues with tutorials also confuses me, most games are straightforward and really need no tutorial, it's like people who review bomb a Souslike for not having a difficulty scaler.

　　　　　　　　 　　　　     　     ▄      ▄
　　　　　　　　 　　　　  ▄█▄   █▀█▀█  ▄█▄
　　　　　　　　　　 　　▀▀████▄█▄████▀▀
　　　　　　　　　　 　　            ▀█▀█▀
　　　　　　　　 　　　　   𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒃𝒂𝒕𝒇𝒖𝒍 𝒅𝒂𝒚