poor people

poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people poor people

You see, it was a reference to the duo of comments from 8:55am made by Mike P asking if Mike S was his dad then followed by a response by drew that while Mike is not his dad, Lauren is indeed his mom. This opened up a void regarding the fraternal parentage. Now, some religions believe in the concept of a “virgin birth”, whereby a child (often a savior or prominent hero) is conceived without the ejaculate of a mortal man, instead by the "will" or "hand" of a deity. Since our discussion left a somewhat humorous vacancy, I took the opportunity to make a connection between mythology and the current dialog. However, this jest relied upon many factors: the audience reading the prior statements, connecting them to the comments, understanding the connection

You see, it was a reference to the duo of comments from 8:55am made by Mike P asking if Mike S was his dad then followed by a response by drew that while Mike is not his dad, Lauren is indeed his mom. This opened up a void regarding the fraternal parentage. Now, some religions believe in the concept of a “virgin birth”, whereby a child (often a savior or prominent hero) is conceived without the ejaculate of a mortal man, instead by the "will" or "hand" of a deity. Since our discussion left a somewhat humorous vacancy, I took the opportunity to make a connection between mythology and the current dialog. However, this jest relied upon many factors: the audience reading the prior statements, connecting them to the comments, understanding the connection

You see, it was a reference to the duo of comments from 8:55am made by Mike P asking if Mike S was his dad then followed by a response by drew that while Mike is not his dad, Lauren is indeed his mom. This opened up a void regarding the fraternal parentage. Now, some religions believe in the concept of a “virgin birth”, whereby a child (often a savior or prominent hero) is conceived without the ejaculate of a mortal man, instead by the "will" or "hand" of a deity. Since our discussion left a somewhat humorous vacancy, I took the opportunity to make a connection between mythology and the current dialog. However, this jest relied upon many factors: the audience reading the prior statements, connecting them to the comments, understanding the connection, appreciating the awesome alliteration in “♥♥♥♥ of Dad”, not being offended by religious and/or ♥♥♥♥ jokes, and not being ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ retarded (in regards to both the listener and the joke itself).

This guy tricked me