Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Michels and Cruyff did something special, but they also relied upon their team's superior athleticism (just like the Hungarians of the 50s). I don't think we will see anything like it in today's competitive game.
- It can be hard to implement, particularly for the forwards - tweak all the players individual roles to the philosophy
- rigidity in defense / zonal marking is strong but can blow up spectactularly
- don't suddenly change formation - your teams needs to be comfortable with it before playing it to be good
- FM2013 has nerfed the domination of the 4-3-3 since release with patches - really!
- maybe you already had a better formation for the players you have? i dunno - IMO this tactic is solid but not a solution to everything
- you didn't outscore your opponents xD no seriously, mix up your attack and attack more
- bad luck? poor morale from the other 2 losses? your opponents outplayed you with a counter-attacking 4-2-3-1?
where am i going wrong?