Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Michels and Cruyff did something special, but they also relied upon their team's superior athleticism (just like the Hungarians of the 50s). I don't think we will see anything like it in today's competitive game.
- It can be hard to implement, particularly for the forwards - tweak all the players individual roles to the philosophy
- rigidity in defense / zonal marking is strong but can blow up spectactularly
- don't suddenly change formation - your teams needs to be comfortable with it before playing it to be good
- FM2013 has nerfed the domination of the 4-3-3 since release with patches - really!
- maybe you already had a better formation for the players you have? i dunno - IMO this tactic is solid but not a solution to everything
- you didn't outscore your opponents xD no seriously, mix up your attack and attack more
- bad luck? poor morale from the other 2 losses? your opponents outplayed you with a counter-attacking 4-2-3-1?
where am i going wrong?