Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Also, with regards to electrification: it was still regarded as experimental in the 1920s, and the limited electrification on the NER was the pet project of (I believe) the NER's Chief Mechanical Engineer. The gains weren't considered sufficient compared to the costs of electrification, and the LNER was very concerned with keeping costs down. It wasn't until the Woodhead electrification in the late 30s (finished post-war) that Gresley got support from the LNER Board to experiment with electrification again. Then, when BR took over, the Loco had been in storage for decades, poorly maintained, non-standard (being a prototype) and ultimately the EM2s on the Woodhead Line could match it for performance even if BR ended up adopting the LNER 15kv DC electric system over the 25kv AC system that was ultimately chosen.